
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.3 by Marek Hlavac, Social Policy Institute. E-mail: marek.hlavac at gmail.com
% Date and time: Thu, Jun 06, 2024 - 13:01:43
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Regression results regarding belief Updating} 
  \label{} 
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcccccc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 & \multicolumn{6}{c}{\textit{Dependent variable:}} \\ 
\cline{2-7} 
 & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Binary belief (0/1)} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Continuous belief (0~1)} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Hypothetical scenario of transfer provision & 3.859$^{**}$ & 4.048$^{**}$ & 4.158$^{**}$ & 0.542$^{**}$ & 0.542$^{**}$ & 0.542$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.568) & (0.608) & (0.637) & (0.047) & (0.048) & (0.048) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Role in the first six rounds & 0.539 & 0.575 & 0.735 & 0.043 & 0.046 & 0.065 \\ 
  & (0.569) & (0.636) & (0.737) & (0.048) & (0.052) & (0.059) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Age &  & 0.016 & $-$0.015 &  & 0.003 & 0.001 \\ 
  &  & (0.177) & (0.187) &  & (0.014) & (0.015) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Female &  & $-$0.159 & $-$0.118 &  & $-$0.028 & $-$0.018 \\ 
  &  & (0.513) & (0.551) &  & (0.045) & (0.046) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Christian &  & 0.841 & 1.031 &  & 0.059 & 0.085 \\ 
  &  & (0.648) & (0.786) &  & (0.053) & (0.064) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Muslim &  & 1.358 & 1.581 &  & 0.085 & 0.120 \\ 
  &  & (0.922) & (0.883) &  & (0.079) & (0.076) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Choice in the beauty contest &  &  & $-$0.002 &  &  & 0.0001 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.011) &  &  & (0.001) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Num. of correct answers in the CRT &  &  & 0.086 &  &  & 0.022 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.366) &  &  & (0.029) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Altruism &  &  & $-$0.016 &  &  & $-$0.012 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.230) &  &  & (0.019) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Positive reciprocity &  &  & $-$0.311 &  &  & $-$0.022 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.195) &  &  & (0.018) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Constant & $-$6.867$^{**}$ & $-$7.945 & $-$6.611 & $-$0.394$^{**}$ & $-$0.471 & $-$0.391 \\ 
  & (1.319) & (4.500) & (4.999) & (0.088) & (0.333) & (0.380) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
Observations & 120 & 120 & 120 & 120 & 120 & 120 \\ 
Adjusted R$^{2}$ &  &  &  & 0.523 & 0.515 & 0.509 \\ 
Log Likelihood & $-$46.058 & $-$44.428 & $-$43.510 &  &  &  \\ 
\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\textit{Note:}  & \multicolumn{6}{l}{Models 1 to 3 use logit regressions, whereas Models 4 to 6 use OLS regressions; standard errors, clustered at the individual level, in parentheses; * p<0.05, ** p<0.01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\end{table} 
